PENGARUH FRAUD PENTAGON TERHADAP PERILAKU KECURANGAN AKADEMIK

Nurull Alfian, Runik Puji Rahayu, Runik Puji Rahayu

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the fraud pentagon on academic fraud behavior. Collecting data in this study was carried out with a quantitative type of research by distributing questionnaires to 100 (one hundred) students. The data analysis method used is using multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that the fraud pentagon had a positive and significant effect on academic fraud behavior. Partially there is a positive and significant effect of pressure on academic cheating behavior, there is an insignificant effect of opportunity on academic cheating behavior, there is an insignificant effect of rationalization on academic cheating behavior, there is a positive and significant effect on the ability of academic cheating behavior and there is positive and significant influence of ethics on academic deficiency behavior.


Keywords


Academic Fraud Behavior, Pentagon Fraud, Students.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : Rineka Hak Cipta.

Albrecht, W. Steve, Albrecht, Chad O., Albrecht Conan C., & Zimbelman, Mark F. 2011. Fraud Examination (Fourth Edition). South-Western : USA. Anderman, Eric M., Cupp, Pamela K., & Lane Derek. 2010. Impulsivity and Academic Cheating. The Journal of Experimental Education,

Bahri. 2018. Metodologi Peneletian Bisnis Lengkap Dengan Teknik Pengelolaan Spss :Penerbit ANDI, yogyakarta

Christina Putri Darmayanti. 2018. Hubungan Faktor-Faktor Dalam Dimensi Fraud Traingle Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta : Sikripsi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta

Desiana Dwi Pamungkas. 2014. Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Dalam Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Siswa Kelas Xi Akuntansi Smk Negeri 1 Tempel Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015 : Sikripsi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Dody Hartanto. 2012. Bimbingan & Konseling Menyontek: Mengungkap Akar Masalah dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Endra Murti Sagoro. 2011. “Pensinergian Mahasiswa, Dosen, dan Lembaga dalam Pencegahan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi”. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia.

Ghozali, Imam. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS23. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.

Hendricks 2004 Who Cheat At University A Selfreport Study Of The Dishonest Academic Behaviouts In A Sample Of Australian University Student. Australian Jurnal Of Psychology. Vo; 57 (1). Page 1-10

Komputer, W. 2017. Mudah Menguasai SPSS. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.

Manurung D.T.H. dan Hadian, N. 2013. Detection Fraud of Financial Statement with Fraud Triangle. Proceedings of the 23rd International Business Researcher Conference di Marriot Hotel, Melbourne, Australia.

Mason, K. 2006. Student Integrity. Journal the Business Review

Matthew, K., Kakwezi, P., & Kayize, D. 2013. The Effects of Fraudulent Procurement Practices on Public Procurenment Performance. International Journal of Business and Behavioural Sciences,

Muhammad Irawan. 2017. Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi Angkatan Tahun 2015 Universitas Negeri Semarang Tahun Ajaran 2016 / 2017 : Skripsi Universitas Negeri Semarang

Muhammad Faisal Dwi Kusuma. 2018. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mahasiswa Melakukan Tindakan Kecurangan Akademik Dengan Perspektif Fraud Diamond Dan Religiusitas (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Islam Indonesia) : Skripsi Universitas Islam Indonesia

Priyatno, Duwi. 2012. Cara kilat belajar analisis dengan SPSS 20. CV. Andi offset, Yogyakarta.

Rangkuti, Anna Armeini. 2011. Academic Cheating Behaviour of Accounting Students: A Case Study in Jakarta State University. In Educational Integrity: Culture and Values. Proceedings 5th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity.

Sekaran, Uma. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis Edisi 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2011.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D; Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung.

Sumaidi. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian : Pt Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Sorunke, Olukayode Abayomi. 2016. Personal Ethics and Fraudster Motivation: The Missing Link In Fraud Triangle and Fraud Diamond Theories. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, Vol. 6 (2) hal 159-165.

Wolfe, David T., Dan Dana R. Hermanson. “The Fraud Diamond: Considering The Four Elements Of Fraud.” The Cpa Journal, 2014: 38-42.

Widianingsih, Luky Patricia. 2013. Students Cheating Behaviors: The Influences Of Fraud Triangle. Review Of Integrative Business & Economics Research,

Zimbelman, Mark. F dkk. 2014. Akuntansi Forensik. Edisi 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.53712/aktiva.v6i1.1130

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing: 

 

 

    

 Member Of:

 

Reference Manager:

  

Published by Prodi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Madura
Jl. Raya Panglegur Km 3,5 Pamekasan
Phone: (0324) 322231

website: http://ejournal.unira.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_aktiva/index

Email: jaa.unira@gmail.com

AKTIVA by Universitas Madura is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.